📰 Source: 4chan | /pol/

✍️ Original author: Anonymous

⬆️ score: 222

I’m making this thread because /pol/ and the right-wing in general have been full of anti-pornography rhetoric for a long time, but I have three main problems with the movement.

1. How is “pornography” even defined? One minute, anti-porn activists will say “Porn is bad because it’s all live-action videos of big black men raping white women!” The next minute, these same activists will say “That DRAWING of a woman is porn because her boobs are big!” even if the drawing in question contains no nudity.
2. Why is there so much implicit misandry in the anti-porn movement? A lot of anti-porn activists falsely assume that only men create and look at porn. Furthermore, the main reason why modern men look at porn is because feminism has made real women a pain in the ass to deal with.
3. Why do so many people assume that banning porn will sove everything? Porn is illegal in South Korea. Despite this, South Korean men are the craziest incels on the planet and South Korean women are the craziest feminists outside of Western Civilization. Discuss.

🤖 Selected by AI: ai-selected

This post was automatically imported by OratioRepostBot.