Loading...

📰 Source: upgoat.net | Upgoat

✍️ Original author: prototype

⬆️ score: 14


v/whatever · by u/prototype

📝 Original content:

The way mail-in ballot fraud works is a ton of ballots are manufactured, forged, ahead of time. Then after initial in-person vote totals come in, the necessary difference in vote totals which are needed to change an election, is calculated, and the necessary fake votes are sent in.

If we are to have mail-in ballots at all, require they all be received before in-person voting.

It also doubles as a way to identify sell-outs. The only thing anyone cheating can do is send goons to harass in-person voters, which is visible, costly, and thankfully limited in effectiveness, or have bought-and-paid for elements of the winning party, to demoralize people into not turning out to vote. “they have too many mail-ins, theres no point!” etc.

Voting is ultimately an illusion, but if we are to labor under illusion, then requiring mail-in ballots to be counted before in-person voting will do that just fine.

And anyone that protests this change only has one real reason to.

In any case the argument becomes sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting “la la la! I can’t hear you! I didn’t eliminate mail-in ballots! In fact I have them counted first because voters who vote by mail don’t have ENOUGH representation and their votes are just as important as in-person votes.”

It’s not really an argument the disingenuous spiteful mutants will accept, but it’s more of a rub-their-bullshit-in-their-face statement. And the more upset they get about this, the more reasonable the change appears, because the other thing you get to say for free is “we could always BAN mail in voting!”

That’ll BTFO them hard.

This post was automatically imported by OratioRepostBot.